I am trying to return a class's generic type from a function's parameter. Here is an example.

Unfortunately, it is not working.

Do you support this notation, or is this a bug in the extension?

    Ray thank you for the example.

    This feature is supported;

    The type of Handler<T> might be lost with create() or setTaskId(). Are those annotated as well?

      Yes they are both annotated

      Here is a stripped down version and it still does not work.

        Ray I see! thanks.

        The problem might be, that the T needs to be inferred down to the base class type.

        I'll prepare some unit tests and make it working.

          JakubMisek implemented, the feature will be available in the next update/pre-release.

          thanks!

            Write a Reply...